Patronizing analogies do not improve the situation.
A lot of people are vastly underestimating the amount of work it'll take to fit characters into the new timeline. Perhaps some characters, like Lion, will make the transition almost seamlessly. Others have backgrounds that are very closely intertwined with relationships, alliances, and circumstances on the current SWFans board. It's a great deal of work, at best, and terribly frustrating, at worst, to tear all that down and try to make a new place for an established character.
I think the timeline change is a bold idea. I haven't decided how I'm going to approach it yet; I know that my characters are the sort that will need a fair bit of overhaul if I choose to use them again. Nevertheless, I have been quite frustrated with how a great many people are handling those who disagree with the changes.
As far as I can tell, the relevant pros and cons have been laid out pretty clearly. The decision has been made. Some people like the result, others don't. Those who don't are not deficient in their understanding, creativity, or work ethic. They have their reasons, and they don't need to be harrangued, cajoled, or reassured.
So may I suggest we stop retreading old ground and risking hard feelings? Since the decision has been set in motion, perhaps we should move on to planning for the beginning of the story--discussing what groups will be available, what their relative conditions will be--e.g., is there any centralized Jedi presence? If so, where? What darkside groups are active? Who's leading them? Are the imperial leaders the same? Since the splinter groups won't exist anymore, how will they be organized?
Obviously, these things need to be decided by the group leaders themselves, not by board-wide committee--but, as of yet, I don't even know where to look for such information.