Kelt Simoson
Dec 12th, 2003, 02:35:02 AM
Well i hate to admit it, but Medal of Honor is finaly beaten from the top spot (in my opinion) of world war two ground founder games. Call of Duty is 100% more intence, 100% more action packed and in my opinion 50% more realistic..you actully venture with a full squad rather than being alone for 90% of the game. Okay, the graphics are a little rough at the moe, but im sure pathches will sort that out, hell its a new game.
The raw intence battles in the game are awsome, you really get into the game, having to litrally take over with you squad mates while a tiger roles through to blast the buidings are you to a pulp looking for you while squads of axis soldiers search to debris. its great also the fact you squad members have a life of their own, they take up MG42 nests to take out the enemy, pick up left over panzer busters to take out tanks, pick up additonal weaponry that they actually use.
Its great, its intence and im buying the game at any given time i have the money. 10/10 for activision. MOH better shape up or in my opinion, be beaten.
www.callofduty.com
The raw intence battles in the game are awsome, you really get into the game, having to litrally take over with you squad mates while a tiger roles through to blast the buidings are you to a pulp looking for you while squads of axis soldiers search to debris. its great also the fact you squad members have a life of their own, they take up MG42 nests to take out the enemy, pick up left over panzer busters to take out tanks, pick up additonal weaponry that they actually use.
Its great, its intence and im buying the game at any given time i have the money. 10/10 for activision. MOH better shape up or in my opinion, be beaten.
www.callofduty.com