Battlefield 1942 and Star Wars? Not a mod you say? Nice.

[ReaperFett]

http://www.playstationmagazine.com/article2/0,4364,1400903,00.asp

[Ishan Shade]

....sweeeeeeet.

This looks awesome, good lookin' out Fett !

[Charley]

(yawn)

They'll need to do better to impress me. Graphics look really weak. This is positioned to go the way of Force Commander unless they change something.

[Gav Mortis]

It looks weird, the graphics are fuzzy. Is that in-game or just a problem with the screen shots?

[ReaperFett]

I'd assume problem with the screenshots. It looks to me like it's an actual photo taken of a screen.

[Darth007]

Eh, i dont know. I would love BF1942 if it wasnt so choppy and laggy, but I shouldnt blame the game its probably just my lousy GeForce2 graphics card. Maybe I can get a new one by Christmas and actual enjoy these games.

[Charley]

Originally posted by Darth007
Eh, i dont know. I would love BF1942 if it wasnt so choppy and laggy, but I shouldnt blame the game its probably just my lousy GeForce2 graphics card. Maybe I can get a new one by Christmas and actual enjoy these games.


It's your card, trust me.

[Dark Lord Dyzm]

If they make the controls like Outcast, then it worth looking into.

The Star Wars Battlefield 1942 Mod didn't load on my PC...
It will also only be good if they make all the ships, vehicles, and stuff like BF does.

At-At driving... *drools*

[ReaperFett]

The Mod was alright, but you can tell it was version 1. I mean, if you can't fly, there's no point being a Rebel AT ALL.

[Darth Viscera]

The Galactic Conquest mod didn't have the same high quality of gameplay as Desert Combat or BF1942. The vehicle reactions & weapons are unwieldy compared to the others.

[Ishan Shade]

I think the game is still being developed hince the fuzzy graphics and screenshots...they're probably early in development.

It has the promise to be good.

[Darth007]

yeah with my card theres no point to the game other than flying and screwing around, because being its impossible to hit anything as infantry its pointless

[Garrett Blade]

I'll keep my eye on that one. I love Battlefield 1942. But then again, it's no MOH:AA! :)

[Charley]

I like the MOH games better, but only because I'm a huge WW2 nerd and I like the storyline and attention to little details. That, and I generally prefer playing single player rather than multiplayer.

[Garrett Blade]

What I prefer in single player over multiplay MOH:AA is the variety in the missions. Each level you're doing different stuff, whereas multiplayer its the same corridors over and over again, the same weapons unless you change in between deaths and just kill kill kill. Not that thats a bad thing though - Stalingrad sniper matches are great fun :) Whenever I play mr friend Peter, we always end up at 29/30 kills each. Then its a really tense 3-10 minutes to see who gets the winning shot. They're the best games for me.

[Sean Piett]

Thx, but no thx