PDA

View Full Version : Broadsword - class Siege Monitor



Telan Desaria
Jun 2nd, 2003, 03:40:28 PM
Name: Broadsword – class Monitor

Designation – Heavy Monitor

Type – Siege Platform

Dimensions-
: Keel – 780 meters
: Beam – 400 meters
: Mast – 300 meters

Layout -
- View Attached Dossier

Armament –
- 4 Quad-turbolaser Batteries (1 gun, dorsal and ventral surfaces, port sponson – 2 total; same starboard sponson – 4 totale’ grande)
- 150 Heavy Turbolaser Cannon (60: dispersed, port sponson; 60: dispersed, starboard sponson; 30: dispersed, central spar)
- 150 Heavy Proton Warhead Launchers (60: dispersed, port sponson; 60: dispersed, starboard sponson; 10: ventral – center; 20 dorsal: dispersed – center)
- 20 Quad Laser Batteries (dispersed throughout)

Defenses –
- 4 Novaldex CG-18 Deflector Generators (2 Tower dome mounted; 2 ventral hull – sunken)
- 40 Light Flechette Launchers (Dispered throughout)
- Heavy Armor Plating

Engines – TDR (Tamylian Drive Yards – Thyferra) GLG20. Internal Workings Classified. Output module – four aft-mounted conical units.
- Reactor – TDY GLG18 Primary Source Reactor. Internal Workings Classified.

Speed – Slow; plodding

Armor – Thick. Designed to absorb great damage without aid of shields

Shields – Destroyer-grade

Launch Bay: Located ventral hull. Interior chambers house maintenance facilities/repair/storage. Size – 50 meters

Vessel Compliment –
x1 D-9 Assault Shuttles
x2 Skipray Blastboats
x1 Lambda-class Shuttle
x3 Sentinel-class Shuttles

x1 Squadrons TIE Defender Mk IIs (12craft)

Vehicle Compliment –
x2 AT-ST Walkers for rescue purposes

Crew Compliment –
(Numbers include Flight Operations Personnel)
Officers: 1450
Crew: 13005
Droids: 5883

Description

Orders were given to the Imperial Department of Military Research (IDMR) to design a heavy support vessel whose dedicated role was elimination of planet-based fortifications and defenses. High numbers of anti-aerial artillery had prevented Victory-class Destroyers and other atmosphere-capable bombardment platforms from descending. Barrage support from orbiting battleships had proven adequate but not successful. The great range at which the Imperial III- and IV- class Destroyers had to discharge their medium weapons prevented efficiency and any measure of accuracy; concentrating available Destroyers for Army support was considered by Command a waste of fuel. Heavy weapons were lacking in concentration to eliminate fortified positions, fortress belts, and bunker systems.

The Broadsword mounts nearly all large bore weapons, and concentrates them in battery clusters to provide EOT and FOF (Energy on Target and Field of Fire, respectively). Their range equals those of the Fleet’s ships of the line, the monitor merely concentrates them to provide a tremendous deal of support to surface operations.

The ship, however, has been designed with siege conditions or assault stages in mind: the presence of enemy fighter craft and small capital ships is not considered. In the occasion the ship is forced to engage, gunships and two fighter squadrons have been attached to keep fighters away. Large caliber weapons cannot rotate quickly enough to fire at faster ships. In addition, a small number of close in defenses, such as the quad lasers, have been added, though their presence is for an illusion of crew safety than its practice.

As well, the Broadsword is not intended for deployment alone or as a main-stay warship. Her speed at both sublight and hyperspace is much slower than that of primary-action cruisers, Destroyers, and battleships. Another factor in her deployment must be considered fuel availability. The ship carries in excess of –oh-point-one million tonnes, but this reserve is for the drive system: due to the drain on the reactor from the heavy weapons, more fuel must be consumed to operate the reactor; the vessel is extremely blunt and heavy, increasing again consumption for the drive system. The ship is highly expensive to operate.

The Broadsword is a bombardment platform, and in this respect, can be used in an assault role: her weapon compliment has proven more than sufficient to disable even the newly-released Golan X Defense Platform. However, small supporting craft and fighters must be kept at a distance by escorts. The hull armor, though thick, will not tolerate any more than three consecutive torpedo volleys (considered 24 warheads) at any one point after shield collapse.

All weapons are arrayed on the three hull-sections, central, port and starboard sponson, to be broadside in their positioning so that relatively few weapons are forward facing, hence the title of monitor and not mainstay combat man of war.

Design is complete. Production on a prototype will commence upon completion of the Aurora-class Star Destroyer Anariah at tamylian.

Estimated Production Cost – 155.000.000.00 Imperial Credits
Imported System Cost – 34.000.000.00
Stores/Fuel Cost – 87.000.000.00

Total Cost Estimated – 276.000.000.00 at launch

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 12th, 2004, 01:20:01 AM
.Just my opinion
The ship needs to be bigger. thats alot of weapons and internal space. Looking at the diagram you are losing close to 60 % of your internal area. For you to have all of your weapons on a forward arch it would have to be really wide. A star destroyer is designed as such. but i know you are aware of this. Most republic ships such as the cal cruisers are meant to fight from a broadside arch. IF you were wanting to fill the role you described I would make the craft Wider The cargo cap. for the torps alone would eat up your internal area. Its 20 % smaller then a Vic but out guns An imp. Internal power would be a consideration. If escort vessels are needed anyway why the fighters and quads. that would save alot of room there.

You ask for my opinion :(

If you want to kill planetary defenses I'll lone you a couple Terminator Velocity Cannons.:)

Telan Desaria
Mar 12th, 2004, 02:52:29 AM
You're right, which is why I've scaled back the number of my supporting craft as well as half the compliment of ground vessels.

The weapons are locating in broadside positions on either of the three hull sections, allowing me to keep two half of each sponson and a third of the primary section open to munitions storage.

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 12th, 2004, 12:49:35 PM
Ill do a rendering and get the exact Dimensions. this may help with my displacement calculations. The design allows for maximum external space. That is for sure. I just think it should be a tad bit bigger to allow for adequate internal space.

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 12th, 2004, 01:17:23 PM
first model has the width at 478 meters if length is 780

Telan Desaria
Mar 12th, 2004, 01:19:17 PM
that was a typo. Wdith should be total 400m

imported_Reshmar
Mar 12th, 2004, 03:15:40 PM
Due to the width / heigth of the outer hull sections I would go with a total of 6 conical units. it looks better on the model :lol

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 12th, 2004, 03:18:28 PM
Oh no I defiled your board with Rebel Scum

Telan Desaria
Mar 12th, 2004, 03:37:56 PM
I didn't know you wer Reshmar.

Ahhhh!!!!



*runs away screaming, pulling hair out by the bushel.

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 12th, 2004, 03:58:59 PM
with that hair cut you didnt have much to pull.

Telan Desaria
Mar 12th, 2004, 04:51:15 PM
it;s regulation.

How comes the rendering.


And I want to keep the pylon/three section design.

imported_STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Mar 13th, 2004, 01:15:24 AM
yes I know i will keep it I had to work tonight but i will try to work on it this wekend

Tear
Mar 13th, 2004, 03:03:43 AM
Originally posted by STELA'SHLIT'NURUODO
Oh no I defiled your board with Rebel Scum

lmao..i dont know why but that just cracked me up

Telan Desaria
Mar 13th, 2004, 03:13:16 AM
Because lash is just typically hilarious.