ReaperFett
Apr 28th, 2003, 03:43:11 PM
Because I'm confused, and I know at least two others are similar.
Basically, this is what I don't get.
Darth Vader is fine because, although he has the same armour, name and is a Sith, he uses him differently.
Oddball is fine because, despite having MANY similarities to Deadpool, he has a different name and slightly different mannerisms.
Jesse Custer is fine because, despite having the same name and look (According to Sage), he changed a few things.
It is fine that we have a character with Aragorn's face and surname having a romance with a character with [Liv Tyler's character]'s surname and face, as well as a common use of Elvish.
Boba Fett (I think) and Wedge Antilles are fine, despite being the same characters we know.
Fox Mulder and Dana Scully are deleted because they have the same name and pictures, and follow similar stories, despite integrating themselves into the SW universe.
So basically I ask that this question is answered publicly. Where is the line drawn on what is fine and what is plagaristic?
Basically, this is what I don't get.
Darth Vader is fine because, although he has the same armour, name and is a Sith, he uses him differently.
Oddball is fine because, despite having MANY similarities to Deadpool, he has a different name and slightly different mannerisms.
Jesse Custer is fine because, despite having the same name and look (According to Sage), he changed a few things.
It is fine that we have a character with Aragorn's face and surname having a romance with a character with [Liv Tyler's character]'s surname and face, as well as a common use of Elvish.
Boba Fett (I think) and Wedge Antilles are fine, despite being the same characters we know.
Fox Mulder and Dana Scully are deleted because they have the same name and pictures, and follow similar stories, despite integrating themselves into the SW universe.
So basically I ask that this question is answered publicly. Where is the line drawn on what is fine and what is plagaristic?