PDA

View Full Version : Tobey Maguire Out As Spider-Man?



Jinn Fizz
Mar 18th, 2003, 08:02:36 AM
Maguire Questionable for 'Spider-Man' Sequel
Tue Mar 18, 3:33 AM ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - He may still have radioactive blood at the box office, but a bad back could end up derailing Tobey Maguire's return as "Spider-Man."

Maguire, who became a Hollywood titan starring in last year's top-grossing movie as the web-slinging Marvel Comics superhero, may be replaced in the "Spider-Man" sequel by the real-life boyfriend of his on-screen love interest, Kirsten Dunst, Daily Variety reported in its Tuesday editions.

Maguire's spokeswoman told the entertainment trade paper the actor is still healing from "mild discomfort in his back" brought on by physically demanding roles in his last two films.

Maguire finished production on the original stunt-heavy "Spider-Man" in April 2001, then went to work 18 months later on "Seabiscuit," portraying jockey Red Pollard. That four-month shoot wrapped last month, Variety said.

The question now is whether he will be well enough to reprise his role as the teenage geek transformed by the bite of a radioactive spider in time to begin production on "The Amazing Spider-Man" sequel project.

"With an April 12 start date around the corner, everyone involved wants to be certain he is able to do the intense stunts," his spokeswoman said in a statement.

In line to don Peter Parker's red-and-blue tights if Maguire isn't fit to swing from skyscrapers again is actor Jake Gyllenhaal, who happens to be dating Dunst and who recently starred in the films "Moonlight Mile" and "The Good Girl."

Because of scheduling conflicts, it would be hard to delay production on the "Spider-Man" sequel to give Maguire more time to recover, Variety said.

The film originally was slated to begin shooting in January but was pushed to April so that Maguire could complete work on "Seabiscuit." In addition, Dunst, reprising her role as "Spider-Man" heroine Mary Jane Watson, is slated to begin production this summer on her next project, the tennis film "Wimbledon."

In any event, "The Amazing Spider-Man" remains on a tight schedule to make the May 7, 2004 release date set by distributor Columbia Pictures, a unit of Sony Corp., Variety said.

Questions about Maguire's fitness to return as Spider-Man for the sequel come only a month after his agents renegotiated a career-best $17 million salary for the actor, more than four times what he earned for the original "Spider-Man" film, Variety said. "Spider-Man" was the highest-grossing movie of 2002, generating worldwide ticket sales of $800 million, according to the entertainment trade paper.

jjwr
Mar 18th, 2003, 08:29:39 AM
Ouch, that'll really suck if he isn't in it. He fit that part so well.

sirdizzy
Mar 18th, 2003, 08:37:57 AM
wow thats a bombshell, he nailed the part so well i can't imagine anyon else in the part

ReaperFett
Mar 18th, 2003, 10:57:05 AM
I thought he was a good Parker, but average at best Spiderman. I'd rather he stayed though.

Sanis Prent
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:03:10 AM
Um, why is this a problem? Just give him the low-impact scenes outside of the suit, FFS. At worst, they'll have to digitally paste his head onto somebody. OH NOS!!

Jedi Master Carr
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:23:32 AM
That is what I would do Charley, makes sense to me.

JMK
Mar 18th, 2003, 02:09:53 PM
I would hate to see him go, I'm a sucker for continuity, but if he absolutely had to go, Gyllenhaal would be a decent choice. He also looks quite similar to Maguire.

ReaperFett
Mar 18th, 2003, 05:31:33 PM
Um, why is this a problem? Just give him the low-impact scenes outside of the suit, FFS. At worst, they'll have to digitally paste his head onto somebody. OH NOS!!
Depends. What if he has to do a lot out of the suit?

Sanis Prent
Mar 18th, 2003, 05:37:11 PM
Well, considering that Peter Parker tries to AVOID BEING LINKED TO SPIDERMAN at all costs, probably not too much that's physically taxing.

JMK
Mar 18th, 2003, 05:42:47 PM
Very true, Peter has already discovered his powers. He has no more use for being obvious with them.

TheHolo.Net
Mar 18th, 2003, 05:44:54 PM
But....if SM 2 has anything to do with the Venom Carnage story arc, there is out of suit interaction, because Venom and Carnage know that Peter is Spiderman, at least in the comics.

ReaperFett
Mar 18th, 2003, 05:45:29 PM
So, if Doc Ock smashes through a wall in the Daily Bugle, he wouldnt run? He has to stand still and step in-costume, while Ock CONVENIENTLY doesnt hit him?

IF the rumour is true, there is one difference here. THey read the script. Noone else.

Jinn Fizz
Mar 18th, 2003, 09:48:13 PM
I didn't think Spider-Man was the greatest thing since sliced bread the way a lot of the public seemed to think, but I did enjoy it. And for me, one of the best parts was Tobey Maguire. So if he wasn't in the sequel, that would be a bummer, as far as I'm concerned. :(

Jedi Master Carr
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:20:38 PM
I think he is one reason the movie worked without him, it might not.

Sanis Prent
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:21:57 PM
I dunno...there are plenty of other buff dorks out there. Could always use Dustin Diamond :)

Lilaena De'Ville
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:30:28 PM
DUSTIN DIAMOND!

Is he really buff?! o_O

:mneh

Sanis Prent
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:33:04 PM
You haven't seen him lately?

<a href=http://www.cornstalker.com/scrapbook/albums/screech/03_group_shot.jpg> Dustin Diamond</a>

TheHolo.Net
Mar 18th, 2003, 11:35:18 PM
Please link images not hosted on your own webspace. Bandwidth theft is not cool.

Lilaena De'Ville
Mar 19th, 2003, 03:22:04 PM
He doesn't look buff to me. o_O





Speaking of Buff, where IS HE?! I MISS BUFFJEDI!!! :cry

ReaperFett
Mar 19th, 2003, 03:29:34 PM
Havent seen Bea on TV recently either. COincedence?

Sage Hazzard
Mar 19th, 2003, 06:04:55 PM
Well, movies are not shot end to end. Why can't they just film the out of suit stuff first, than as he gets better, work in the costume stuff. Even if he has to do stunts outside of the costume, they can wait until he'd better. I'm sure there's a couple of months worth of non-spidey shots. Him as Peter, scenes without him in it, etc. Why can't they shoot those first and save the others until he's better?

I thought he was great in the movie and I'd hate to see anyone else as Spidey. Not so much because someone else couldn't do it, but for the sake of continiuty. I hate the fact the Batman films keep shuffling around with actors. The Bond films change as the actors get older, so that's cool. But I don't want to see Tobey, then this other guy, then Tobey again in the third film. That'd suck.

ReaperFett
Mar 19th, 2003, 06:06:14 PM
I doubt TObey would ever return if they changed him.

MasterPewter
Mar 19th, 2003, 07:37:39 PM
Just saw on CNN Toby did sign for part 2 of the spidey adventures.

Taylor Millard
Mar 20th, 2003, 11:55:36 PM
and imdb.com says that He will return as Spidey and has no plan to drop out.