PDA

View Full Version : Rotten Tomatoes - Prequels better reviewed that Originals?



ReaperFett
Aug 24th, 2005, 10:46:01 AM
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/comments/?entryid=197859


Critical Consensus: “Star Wars” Prequels Actually Better Reviewed Than Originals

Based on current active critics though, the results are as expected. The average Tomatometer of the original trilogy handily beats the prequels by 20% -- 90% to 70%, respectively.

Prequels Tomatometer Scores Based on Current Active Critics:
83% - Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
65% - Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones
62% - Star wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
Average Tomatometer: 70%

Original Trilogy Tomatometer Scores Based on Current Active Critics:
80% - Return of the Jedi
98% - The Empire Strikes Back
93% - Star Wars
Average Tomatometer: 90%

However, as user ‘Knelt’ noted in our News section, it’s not fair to compare the two trilogies based mostly on current active critics because most of them saw “the original films as children, and are reviewing them based on nostalgic memories as well as judging them on established ‘classic’ status.”

When “Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace” was released in 1999, a group of us actually went to our local library and dug up a sampling of available sources that reviewed the original trilogy during the time of their respective release dates in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Because those reviews weren’t available online, we OCR-ed them and put them on the web, breaking all kinds of copyright laws in the process. We were quite the rebels back then. However, when we legitimized the company months later, those reviews were the first to go. Thanks to Archive.org, a site that archives the web pages, the quotes are still there but the full text reviews are gone. The results are actually quite surprising.

Tomatometer Scores for Original Trilogy During Original Release Dates:
(Click on the links for the archived quotes from Archive.org)
31% - Return of the Jedi
52% - The Empire Strikes Back
79% - Star Wars
Average Tomatometer: 54%

As one can see, only “Star Wars” managed to be Fresh, with a respectable 79% on the Tomatometer, while the other two sequels got successively worse. Most of the critics thought the first film was an inventive, fun, and entertaining summer popcorn movie. It’s interesting that they complain about the dialogue back then too. “Empire,” which is regarded as the best of the series nowadays, only managed to score a mixed 52%. It received great technical grades, but critics had problems with the plot, one way or other, and thought it was just “minor entertainment.” It got worse with “Jedi” – uneven pacing, no character development, tired acting, and hollow and junky filmmaking. It scored a moldy 30% on the Tomatometer. Prequels were probably the last thing critics wanted back then after the thrashing of the last film.

Ironically, if you compare the average Tomatometer of the prequels and the original trilogies during the time of their respective original release dates, the Prequels are actually better reviewed by 16% -- 70% to 54%, respectively!

Tomatometer Ranking of Star Wars Series Based on Critical Reaction During Original Release Dates:
83% - Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
79% - Star Wars
65% - Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones
62% - Star wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
52% - The Empire Strikes Back
31% - Return of the Jedi"

JMK
Aug 24th, 2005, 12:10:32 PM
Interesting results to be sure.

I think back in the day, ANH was so good, nothing could compare to it. Hence why the scores went down for ESB and RotJ. Fast forward to 1999, after the originals had aged so well and had become deeply rooted in popular culture, the only place to go was down. And TPM certainly was a step down, despite what the box office numbers say. At that point the only place to go for Lucas was up, and AotC improved slightly, either because critics were still pissed off from the TPM bust, or because they genuinely didn't like it. But it's safe to say that RotS set things straight.

Jedieb
Aug 25th, 2005, 08:00:37 PM
The problem with those numbers is that you don't know how many actual reviews were found for the OT. They could have gotten those low percentages from a only a couple dozen OT reviews compared to the 100+ reviews that produced the ratings for the prequels. If someone wants to honestly compare those numbers then they're going to have to show the number of reviews, the names of the critics, and their newspapers/magazines/Network. Without researched and documented OT reviews it's just guesswork. A "sampling" of OT reviews just isn't good enough. Without digging into the reviews of major newspapers, magazines (Time, Newsweek, etc), and PBS and the 3 major networks you can't make a legitimate comparison.